This is kind of funny. Now everyone is looking for smutty screenshots. I thought I was the only one that did that

Now some of you may not agree with me...(People's moral standards being different and all)...but I dont think its right for a "family site" to be displaying this kind of crap. Basically what Im asking is, could someone please remove the ones you see fit and to make sure these people dont do it again.

The problem you're reaching here though, is one man's smut is another's art. There have been WAY too many debates on what art is and isn't, and I really don't want to get tied up into that type of debate (please don't go there). In reality, in my opinion (which really dosen't mean much BUT!) there really hasn't been anything that you don't see on network TV, or in the magazine rack of your local conveinence store, or supermarket for that matter (ie: Maxim etc.). Any little kid who goes to those places or watches tv will see that. So is it right or wrong really?

So finishing up with the example posed, I'll tell you what, I've seen a whole lot more flesh on a real girl on the cover of Sports Illustrated before.

Which issue was that?

All of them?

The only problem this Wombat had with 'Blonde Beauty' was the dinky res size!
I don't like the Anime fetish but thats just my own view .... and I'm not against walls featuring them, but I would prefer to use a desktop with Dolphins, Palm Trees, Rainbows and Lensflares, with one of those sophisticated chrome 'half ring things' as a central motif .... rendered in Bryce of course!

Ok, I see not that it would have been better if I had in the first place kept my opinions to myself... Ill keep that in mind when I visit the message board in the future....

wombat_1!

I didn't even raise an eyebrow over that one, it's actually pretty tame. Go to the mall or any place that might have anime images and you'll see pretty much the same thing and they are all on public display. (not to mention scantily clad men or women on magazines even at the grocery store checkout.) I think this is much ado over nothing. It's just fine that you may want to keep your children from seeing certain things but what is acceptable to one may not be acceptable to another. What you do see around has been deemed as publicly acceptable by society as a whole and I doubt seriously everyone is going to change anything to suit those in the minority frame of thought. They will have to do their own screening and censoring if they want to shield their children from what is commonly available. You are the parent and it's not up to society to conform to what standards you may deem as acceptable for your children...that's your responsibility as a parent.

EV, it's expressed opinions that bring about change...they may not always be aggreed with, but without them things sure would be dull. Don't keep them to yourself. I may get flamed for what I just said...but that's ok...what matters is that I can say it.

Ok, I see not that it would have been better if I had in the first place kept my opinions to myself... Ill keep that in mind when I visit the message board in the future....

Everyone has opinions on everything, that dosen't necessarily make them all right...

And nobody ever said you were wrong either.

I did. What century was the last time we saw legal censorship?

Actually, I'm not a parent but... Nevermind

I agree with Jafo. The little girlie in the right hand corner juxtaposed with the center image and the pin up calendar adds a bit of a pedophilic tone to it. JMO.

MHO? Using the word "slut" in the title of this thread is more offensive than any drawing displayed here.

i believe that all the people that find the color blue,red and green offensive would appreciate it if you would remove all graphics from w.c. to make it a better site

What should it be called then? "One mans slut is another mans art."