well that went nowhere

Well. as I understand a couple were deleted, and it's maybe good to have said it in a thread. Some screenshots deleted, some stay. It keeps the staff awake. Good thing.

I dont see any Hippy. Event is welcome to his opinion and I respect it. But I would be concerned if it resulted in something like that being pulled. What are we talking about here?

Its a pic of a girl. A cartoon no less. Is it provocative? Dunno for sure. Offensive? definately not this particular pic. But if someone does find it so, that lies with them, the viewer, not the Artist , or the "Gallery".

Nudity, rape, pedophilia, etc is a "Black and White" thing. No place for it here. This pic falls in the realm of taste and choice. He likes it, you dont. She thinks its racy, so-and-so thinks it's boring. I dont like a program, I change the channel.

I wont cram smut in anyones face, dont cram prudish, archaic, "blue" censorship in mine. Especially in a community of artists and skinners and its fans.

Btw... Here are the results of my Family Poll... (my wife and kids)

Brianna... age 7 "That's cool"
Corin... age 8 "She's dressed like a boy, ewww"
LMAO
Jason... age 10 "I dunno, it's neat"
Jessica... age 12 "Cool desk dad"
Linda... age n/a "Thats awesome Jay"

ciao

she's dressed like a boy?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

kids

Kids rock. Gotta love em. I wished we all veiwed the world the way they do. make the world a better place.

Somebody already beat me to it by mentioning Britney Spears, but the one lasting impression that this thread left me with earlier was my trying to remember which actress I saw recently at a movie awards ceremony wearing a dress that revealed pretty much the same amount of real flesh as the cartoon girl in that picture is displaying.

Had you chosen one of these 'hentai' pictures with cartoon images of obviously underage girls engaging in crude sexual acts, then I could understand where you're coming from. As it is, if that was truly the worst example you could come up with then maybe you belong in Victorian times.

"Good Lord! Look at that little tart, showing her naked ankles in public. I must go to church and cleanse myself of this evil."

And yes, I thought the use of the word 'slut' infinitely more offensive than the image itself. I'd be more concerned with a child coming to this site, seeing your use of that word, and having to explain to them what it meant.

So in effect your use of this title only served to contribute toward what you're claiming to be fighting. That's irony.

Hum... we're still talking about a cartoon, are we not?

I did not see anything wrong when I went to click on that link to check it out, I thought it was cute, sexy and that's it, when I seen the word "Slut" in the title that definetly was not what I was expecting to see when I clicked on the link... hehe
(I'm getting pretty immune to what is nasty these days thanks to the spam in my mailbox unfortunetly)

on the other hand even cartoons "Can" be done up in such an offensive manner they would need to be removed, but that one you dropped a link on is cute, sexy and nothing offensive is showing nor is she posed in such a way it looks nasty...

hmmmmm... I think Event has a point with that screenshot. It is borderline. I don't find that much of a problem with it but it is borderline

Also Colebine, Maxim, the 30th annual what ever, or Briteny Spears has nothing to do with that screenshot on Wincusto. The comparisions to how people or kids see Briteny all the time and then come to wincutomize and see a image screenshot of a woman (or girl can't tell) showing allot of boobs is not an even comparision.


Also, the title of this thread to me is more offencive then the screenshot because the word 'slut' is a name or a denouncement of a person. In allot of ways it is a curse word.

I disagree with most of the posts here; On boths side actually. Just because it is a cartoon does not mean it is ok to show what could be called skin to a specific degree. A bikini on a beach is not a screenshot on a website.


at the same time the image that is shown for example is borderline mostly because it is a cartoon (if it was a actual woman I would feel it crossed the line)

this one is borderline and can be argued both ways. (I don't think I woould put it on my site but the one with the lady in th water and the green leaves I would cause its more artzy)

and no paxx we are not really talking about a cartoon. I think we are talking about perceptions and ideals.

the subject happens to be a screenshot though...

Doreen, yes I have recieved junk mail like that too. A few time they were cartoons and believe me it was p0rn.

exactly but that particular cartoon is done up cute, sexy nothing slutty about it at all...
nothing nasty showing nor is she posing in a nasty mannor so something like "that" I would not call Slutty at all, but yes even cartoons can be disgusting when there is motive behind the artist to make it so, right?